Bridging the Gap Episode 6: Preparing Organizations for Natural Disasters

Bridging the Gap Episode 6: Preparing Organizations for Natural Disasters

SummitET Subject Matter Experts and Guest Dan Noah from the National Weather Service discuss business continuity as it relates to the emerging threat referenced in the news video:Hurricane Outlook Predicts An Explosive 2024 Atlantic Season.”

Weather.com, May 25, 2024

hurricane season stock image

In this episode of Bridging the Gap, disaster preparedness experts discuss business continuity planning for natural disasters, emphasizing the importance of including all stakeholders, from employees to the CEO, as well as local and federal government.

Business continuity helps businesses maintain operations during disruptions like natural disasters, cyber attacks, or power outages. It ensures minimal downtime and continued service delivery. Business continuity planning (BCP) is crucial and should cover all processes, assets, and personnel, with plans developed in advance involving key stakeholders.

National Weather Storm Predictions Increase

This year, Colorado State University (CSU) is forecasting 23 hurricanes originating from the Saraha Desert; the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is forecasting 21. Not only are storm predictions higher than usual, but they are expected to push into the Gulf of Mexico and up the East Coast rather than out in the Atlantic Ocean.

Hurricane Outlook pie chart from NOAA

Many states have experienced severe storms with flooding, hail and wind damage over the winter and early spring months throughout the U.S. As of June 2024, there have been multiple confirmed natural disaster events. According to recent reports, global natural disasters caused an estimated $43 billion in economic loss in the first quarter of 2024.

With such major economic impacts, organizations that are prepared will be in a better position to handle the hazards, but what can be done to ensure the least possible capital and human loss?

What can companies do to ensure the least possible capital and human loss during a natural disaster?

Weather Notification System and Communication Channels

The wireless emergency alert system on modern cell phones is one of the most effective methods for delivering warnings. It can reach you anywhere, including at home or on the road. Having multiple ways to receive weather warnings is essential for ensuring safety, especially during severe weather events when technology can fail. Here are some methods you can use:

Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA): These are emergency messages sent by authorized government alerting authorities through your mobile carrier. They include extreme weather warnings, local emergencies requiring evacuation or immediate action, AMBER alerts, and Presidential Alerts during a national emergency. You can learn about these alerts and more from the Department of Homeland Security.

Weather Apps and Websites: There are numerous weather apps and websites that provide real-time updates and alerts about severe weather conditions, and most of them allow users to customize alerts based on location.

NOAA Weather Radio: NOAA Weather Radio broadcasts 24/7 weather information directly from the nearest National Weather Service office.

Social Media or News Outlets: Following local news outlets and meteorologists on social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook can provide timely updates and warnings during severe weather events.

Sirens and Public Address Systems: These are especially important for people who are outdoors and do not have access to a cell phone or other warning methods.

Community Alert Systems: Some communities have their own alert systems that send notifications via various channels to residents in severe weather or other emergencies.

Organizational Preparedness for Natural Disasters

Despite the resources and infrastructure available to larger organizations, there are often still gaps in preparedness. Sometimes, larger companies may become complacent, especially if they haven’t experienced a significant emergency in a long time.

Other reasons for the lack of preparedness may include:

Complexity: Large companies often have complex organizational structures, which can make it challenging to ensure that all departments and employees are adequately trained and informed.

Resources: Emergency preparedness requires resources including time, money, and personnel. Companies may prioritize other areas of operation over emergency preparedness, leading to gaps in response capabilities.

Testing: Even if emergency plans exist, they must be regularly tested or updated to ensure employees know how to respond effectively during an actual emergency.

Communication: Some companies struggle with effective communication during emergencies, particularly if they have multiple locations or a dispersed workforce. Ensuring that communication systems are robust and reliable can be a significant challenge.

Regulatory Compliance: While there may be regulations in place requiring companies to have emergency plans, compliance doesn’t always guarantee effectiveness. Internal communications plans and involving everyone in the policy and procedures is necessary to ensure the safety of all team members.

To address these challenges and avoid long-term economic impact of disasters, organizations should regularly review and update emergency plans.

Emergency Plans for Natural Disasters

When developing disaster plans, organizations should prepare for the worst-case scenario. Consider the most challenging disaster in terms of size, scope, time of year, and time of day, then plan for an even more severe event. These plans can be adapted and reused for diverse types of emergencies. For example, hurricane planning often prioritizes locating shelters to be used by the affected communities which can also be used for other types of disasters as well.

Here are some ways you can begin your organization’s disaster planning:

Risk Assessment: Identify the types of natural disasters most likely to affect your region(s) or industry. This could include hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, wildfires, tornadoes, etc. Assess the potential impact of each type of disaster on your organization’s operations, infrastructure, and personnel.

Emergency Response Plan: Create a detailed emergency response plan that outlines specific actions to be taken before, during, and after a natural disaster. This plan should include evacuation procedures, shelter-in-place protocols, communication strategies, and designated roles and responsibilities for employees.

We recommend you also collaborate with local emergency management like first responders, allowing your organization to create more realistic and effective response strategies. This collaboration can provide valuable resources and support during a natural disaster and help streamline response efforts.

Organizational Engagement: Having an emergency plan is great; however, it’s crucial to involve all levels of the organization in the planning process. This helps to ensure everyone is prepared for the disaster and allows for more insightful planning. For example, custodial and maintenance staff often have a deeper understanding of a building’s intricacies and potential issues than the CEO does, and they may provide valuable input for emergency planning procedures.

Communication Plans and Protocols: Build and implement robust communication protocols to ensure timely dissemination of information before, during, and after a natural disaster. This may involve setting up an emergency notification system, establishing communication chains, and providing employees with multiple channels for receiving updates and instructions.

Individual Family Plans: A thorough disaster plan should also include family disaster education for employees. Prioritizing the well-being and safety of staff and their families during a disaster will help ensure that they can continue their work for the organization. All disasters are local.

FEMA’s latest National Preparedness Report indicated that there are “ongoing individual and household preparedness gaps.” Only 42 percent of respondents plan to prepare for identified threats and hazards in the future but have not started, and the percentage of survey participants indicating they did not intend to prepare decreased from 17 percent in 2017 to 9 percent in 2020 but rebounded to 14 percent in 2022. People are experiencing fatigue from preparing for emergencies and disasters.

For more information on how to prepare yourself and your family visit https://ready.gov/be-informed.

Backup Systems and Redundancies: Invest in backup systems and redundancies to minimize the impact of natural disasters on critical operations. This could include backup power generators, redundant data storage systems, and alternative communication channels.

Supply Chain Management: Assess the vulnerability of your supply chain to natural disasters and develop contingency plans to mitigate risks. This could involve diversifying suppliers, stockpiling essential materials, and establishing alternative transportation routes.

Infrastructure Preparedness: Implement measures to enhance the resilience of your facilities to natural disasters. This could include retrofitting buildings to withstand high winds or earthquakes, installing flood barriers, and securing loose objects that could become projectiles in high winds.

Community Engagement: While we expect local and federal governments to maintain robust emergency operations centers, these often aren’t large enough to handle major disasters alone. Prioritizing community disaster education and collaborating with community partners during the planning process significantly enhances disaster response efforts. Many communities are now creating Business Emergency Operations Centers (BEOCs) which highlight the importance of private-public partnerships.

For example, following a disaster, grocery stores play a crucial role in helping the community return to normal. By quickly restoring essential services such as grocery, telecommunications, and banking, a community’s recovery time can be substantially reduced. ​When these businesses are included in disaster planning, they become integral to community preparedness efforts, allowing the government to be reimbursed for related planning expenses.

Review and Exercise Plans: Regularly review, update and exercise your emergency response plans based on lessons learned from drills, real-world incidents, and changes in your organization or operating environment.

The Importance of Experience: Experience plays a significant role in our preparedness activities. While preparedness is sometimes driven by organizational requirements or regulatory compliance, it is often shaped by past experiences. In hurricane-prone areas, small businesses near the water, which are susceptible to flooding, are typically well-versed in emergency preparations. They are usually the first to sandbag and shutter their windows. In contrast, businesses located further inland may not perceive the threat as urgent.

In some hurricanes, heavy rain and flooding cause more damage than the storm surge, even though the storm surge remains the primary risk. For example, 27 inches of rain fell in a short period during Hurricane Ian in Florida in 2023. Rivers rose 10 feet in just 8 hours, leaving people who planned to evacuate the next day unable to exit their homes due to the high water levels.

Start Your Organization’s Disaster Planning

Prepared individuals create more resilient communities. When each person takes responsibility for their own readiness, it strengthens the entire community’s ability to withstand and recover from disasters. Organizations and agencies play a critical role in this ecosystem and prioritizing the development and training of comprehensive preparedness will ensure long-term readiness. Additionally, seeking guidance from emergency management professionals and leveraging technological solutions can help improve overall preparedness.

For a free consultation or more information on how SummitET experts can help you begin your natural disaster planning, enter your information below.

Natural Disaster Planning Consultation for Organizations

Meet the Experts Featured in This Podcast

Dan Noah

Dan Noah

Former Chief Meteorologist for the National Weather Service; Florida Professional Emergency Manager

Adam Montella, Senior Vice President

Adam Montella

Former GM of Emergency Management for the NY & NJ Port Authority; Disaster Management SME

Kevin Quigley, CBRN and WMD Subject Matter Expert at SummitET

Kevin Quigley

CBRNE Subject Matter Expert; Retired Marine Corps CBRNE Defense Officer

Bridging the Gap podcast, episode 5

Bridging the Gap Episode 5: Crises Create Crises: Applying the IDEA Model to Crisis Communication at Higher Education Institutions

In this podcast episode, SummitET Strategic Communications experts sit down with the creators of the IDEA Model for Effective Risk and Crisis Communication and discuss how communicators and decision-makers at higher education institutions can apply the the model when addressing sensitive and controversial issues on their campuses.
Bridging the Gap Episode 4: Crisis Communications for Universities

Bridging the Gap Episode 4: Strategic Communications for Higher Education: Sensitive and Controversial Issues

In this podcast episode, SummitET’s team of Strategic Communications experts discuss crisis communications fundamentals that higher education institutions can incorporate when addressing controversial and sensitive issues with their stakeholders.

SummitET Bridging the Gap Episode 3 Part 1

Bridging the Gap Episode 3, Part 1: Improving Exercise Design and Evaluation; the XF Score

In this podcast episode, SummitET preparedness experts and former DHS Acting Secretary and FEMA Administrator discuss the XF Score™️, a rubric for analyzing the effectiveness of tabletop exercises and trainings for crises.

Active Shooters Over Time

Active Shooter Incidents Over Time

“Active shooters” were not always considered cause for alarm in the United States. This post examines the trend of active shooter incidents over time and offers preparedness solutions to mitigate the threat.

Bridging the Gap Episode 5: Crises Create Crises: Applying the IDEA Model to Crisis Communication at Higher Education Institutions

Bridging the Gap Episode 5: Crises Create Crises: Applying the IDEA Model to Crisis Communication at Higher Education Institutions

In part two of this series focused on strategic communication for higher education, addressing sensitive and controversial issues, SummitET® Strategic Communications experts sit down with internationally recognized scholars of risk and crisis communication, Deanna Sellnow, Ph.D. and Tim Sellnow, Ph.D. to discuss how communicators and decisionmakers can integrate the IDEA Model for effective risk and crisis communication to address sensitive and controversial issues. Higher education institutions can use the IDEA Model to create their own communication framework which is easy to understand, remember, and employ during unprecedented crises experienced at their institutions. 

What is the IDEA Model?

The IDEA model for risk and crisis communication provides spokespersons with a framework for communicating sensitive and controversial issues during times of crisis.  Grounded firmly in theory and empirical research, IDEA uses four key components – Internalization (I), Distribution (D), Explanation (E), and Action (A) – to craft messages and communicate them effectively. 

The IDEA Model
Addressing Communication Gaps and Challenges

Many existing risk communication message templates have an overemphasis on explaining the science behind the risk, leaving the audience concerned but without recommended actions to protect themselves. In other words, the communication was sender-oriented, with an emphasis on information output and a lesser focus on the intended receiver and actionable outcomes. In many cases the communications trainings left lingering questions such as “Was the learning happening? Were people understanding what was going on, realizing its relevance, and taking the appropriate actions?”

The gap between information output and receiver input was in part due to the lack of readymade templates like the IDEA Model. This model was designed to help those who wanted to communicate effectively during a crisis event while ensuring their information was comprehensible to the receiver. 

    Applying the IDEA Model to Higher Education Institutions 

    Higher education is facing several different crises, many related to navigating world events such as the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and Ukraine-Russia conflict. These global, social issues are difficult to discuss and need to be analyzed and addressed in a multi-faceted way, and that is what the IDEA model helps to accomplish.

    Ensuring Stakeholders Understand the Potential Impact of the Crisis 

    Start by identifying the existing information stakeholders have received, then determine how they are interpreting the situation and the risk. Using that knowledge to enhance the messaging around the real (or perceived) risk to develop a more nuanced explanation from an understandable perspective.

    What Process Do Universities Use to Engage with and Understand Their Stakeholders?

    Internalization is not linear; it is very much fueled by dialogue. Higher education institutions can be good at stimulating dialogue and listening to student groups, but not always. As previously mentioned, it is important to start with where the listener is coming from, and then create a mutual understanding about a situation rather than dictating to others the impact and the relevance of a risk or crisis.

    Determine the Most Effective Channels of Communication

    Best practice is for university administrators to simply ask stakeholders what communication channels they use and then commit to effectively using those technologies and pathways. Listening is key. Twenty years ago, risk communication best practices recommended identifying a single best spokesperson and single best channel for delivering messaging. With the advent of 24/7 access to various social media channels, it is critical to have multiple spokespersons converging with a similar message across multiple platforms. Redundancy is not bad; consistency is good.

    “Redundancy is not bad; consistency is good.”

    How Do You Determine the Best Communicator for the Message?  

    It depends on the target audience. Universities have many different stakeholders, and they tend to hold credibility differently from various spokespersons, influencers, and sources. It is important to identify the opinion leaders for your intended audiences. Those opinion leaders are sometimes social media influencers who are needed for their credibility with the target audience that the scientist or academic researcher does not have.

    “We need to be vigilant during the quiet times.”

    To remain adaptive to shifting opinion leaders, we need to be vigilant during the quiet times. When a crisis erupts, it is too late to identify who the influencers are. It is important to have identified multiple stakeholders with diverse perspectives during the quiet periods to create a network that can easily be tapped when needed. If you leave out an influencer in your planning phase, they will have ample opportunity to reach a broad audience on their own, with a message which may not be accurate or reflect your intended message.

    The Easiest Way to Start Training.

    Elevate your team's communication game with our flexible strategic communications workshops. Whether it's in-person, virtual, or hybrid, we offer tailored training options to suit your goals. Empower your team today and enhance your communication skills with expert guidance.

    Putting the IDEA Model into Action 

    Surprisingly, the action element was missing from risk communication previously. The audience received the message of risk but were not given concrete actions they could take to protect themselves. Without action, the credibility of the message deteriorates quickly. The cultural norm of the United States is self-efficacy, what can individuals do to protect themselves and those they care about. Cross-cultural research has shown collective efficacy and community effort is critical to reducing harm and mitigating risk.

    As crisis communicators, we should provide stakeholders with an action plan which includes what they can do, what they should do, and what they must do depending on where you are on the crisis timeline. Furthermore, for the plan to be effective, it must be clearly communicated and feasible, so the intended audience can take action without getting bogged down in details.  

    Future Applications of the IDEA Model 

    There is potential for the IDEA Model and the dialogue that comes with it to help expose middle ground on polarizing issues. It works by requiring communicators to listen and internalize the thoughts and feelings of those affected by an issue before moving forward. Surveys have increasingly shown individuals on both sides of any given political spectrum value the middle ground, especially when they believe they are moving toward it. 

    For the past three years, Dr. Deanna Sellnow and Dr. Tim Sellnow have worked with the DECIPHER Project, a multi-country research collaborative of crisis communication scholars. They studied how authorities and the media in seven different countries affected people’s ability to protect themselves against COVID-19 and be better prepared for the next crisis. This collaborative research looked at government communication, citizen responses, and media coverage and focused on the nuanced differences across the seven represented countries. Understanding these cultural nuances is a critical lesson for crisis communication in the globalized society we live in. 

    Final Takeaway of the IDEA Model 

    As communicators go forward with the application of the IDEA Model, we need to remember to capitalize on the quiet times and build relationships and networks across cultures and other barriers of difference. We should stay vigilant between crises so when they do erupt, we will already have a Community of Practice in place to be able to disseminate a redundant, consistent message. Strategic communication is ongoing and social capital can and should be built during those quiet times. 

    To further engage with Dr. Deanna Sellnow’s and Dr. Tim Sellnow’s work: 

    • Check out their new book: Before Crisis: The Practice of Effective Risk Communication 

    The IDEA model offers a simple and user-friendly approach to crisis communication. Its application highlights the shortcomings of poorly coordinated and poorly executed risk and crisis communications during a crisis event. Adopting the principles of IDEA offers organizations and media outlets the chance to greatly improve disaster communication. 

    Meet the Experts Featured in This Podcast

    Deanna Sellnow, PhD

    Deanna Sellnow, Ph.D.

    Professor of Strategic Communication &
    Co-creator of the IDEA Model

    Tim Sellnow

    Tim Sellnow, Ph.D.

    Professor of Strategic Communication &
    Co-creator of the IDEA Model

    Holly Hardin

    Holly Hardin

    Former Comms Analyst for DOE/ NNSA Enterprise & Emergency Management Lead at ORISE

    Ron Edmond, Crisis Communications Subject Matter Expert

    Ron Edmond, Ed.D.

    Former Acting Director of ORISE Emergency Management Lab & Crisis Communication SME

    Bridging the Gap podcast, episode 5

    Bridging the Gap Episode 5: Crises Create Crises: Applying the IDEA Model to Crisis Communication at Higher Education Institutions

    In this podcast episode, SummitET Strategic Communications experts sit down with the creators of the IDEA Model for Effective Risk and Crisis Communication and discuss how communicators and decision-makers at higher education institutions can apply the the model when addressing sensitive and controversial issues on their campuses.

    Bridging the Gap Episode 4: Crisis Communications for Universities

    Bridging the Gap Episode 4: Strategic Communications for Higher Education: Sensitive and Controversial Issues

    In this podcast episode, SummitET’s team of Strategic Communications experts discuss crisis communications fundamentals that higher education institutions can incorporate when addressing controversial and sensitive issues with their stakeholders.

    SummitET Bridging the Gap Episode 3 Part 1

    Bridging the Gap Episode 3, Part 1: Improving Exercise Design and Evaluation; the XF Score

    In this podcast episode, SummitET preparedness experts and former DHS Acting Secretary and FEMA Administrator discuss the XF Score™️, a rubric for analyzing the effectiveness of tabletop exercises and trainings for crises.

    Active Shooters Over Time

    Active Shooter Incidents Over Time

    “Active shooters” were not always considered cause for alarm in the United States. This post examines the trend of active shooter incidents over time and offers preparedness solutions to mitigate the threat.

    Bridging the Gap Episode 4: Strategic Communications for Higher Education: Sensitive and Controversial Issues

    Bridging the Gap Episode 4: Strategic Communications for Higher Education: Sensitive and Controversial Issues

    SummitET® Strategic Communications experts discuss crisis communications fundamentals that higher education institutions can incorporate when addressing controversial and sensitive issues with their stakeholders.

    There has been quite a bit of groundswell on university campuses and social media about sensitive and controversial topics. The pace at which issues emerge and make headlines is increasing rapidly, and they seem to have a significant lifespan.

    In today’s episode of Bridging the Gap, SummitET Senior Vice President Adam Montella speaks with our team of Strategic Communications experts about crisis communications fundamentals that higher education institutions can incorporate when addressing these challenging issues with their stakeholders.

    What are some sensitive and/or controversial communication issues facing university campuses right now? 
    • Antitrust scrutiny with college athletics 
    • Proliferation of artificial intelligence 
    • Plagiarism and research integrity 
    • Diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) and race relations 
    • Free speech, safe space, and first amendment 
    • Domestic and international political environments 
    • Natural, manmade, and technical disasters 
    • Campus protests 
    • Active shooter incidents 
    • Sexual harassment and exploitation
    • Reputation management

    Note: SummitET exercises and trainings do not cover each of these topics individually; rather, they utilize proven crisis communication strategies to address a broad spectrum of controversial and sensitive issues.

    Footprint of Influence 

    The challenges these issues cause go beyond the boundaries of the campus. They have local, regional, and national effects. They can impact university funding, athletics recruitment, and campus operations. We’ve also witnessed how the response to the issues holds the potential to damage the personal and professional reputation of individuals as well as the brand of higher education institutions.

    The data backs this up. A June 2023 Gallup poll indicated that Americans’ confidence in higher education institutions has declined to its lowest point.  

      Gallup Poll 2023

      A 2022 George Washington University Government Communications and Public Affairs study was conducted to assess public trust in messaging as well as to identify areas for improving communications between government and private sector practitioners. It found that the lack of public trust in government is largely due to a few external factors, including a rise in disinformation, views that the government is politically-motivated, and the hyperpolarization in politics. The study also found that these external factors are often caused by internal communication challenges within the organizations such as an outdated onesizefitsall approach and excessive bureaucracy which lead to inefficiency, disorganization, and slow sharing of information.

      Credibility and Trust 

      Reputations are won or lost in a crisis. Universities are well-versed in handling the everyday crisis; however, new and emerging communication issues present unprecedented challenges which may require additional training and exercises in order for university leaders to be prepared to respond effectively. 

      In order for a stakeholder audience to accept a university’s messaging, the spokesperson must be perceived as being a trustworthy and credible source of information. They should also be able to shoulder the university or organization during a crisis. Credibility can be shared by association; the trustworthiness of a spokesperson can be used to amplify the trustworthiness of the university.

      Key Characteristics of a Trustworthy Spokesperson 

      If these characteristics can be demonstrated during a crisis, it is more likely that the audience will be able to internalize the message and see how it affects them and their belief systems. 

      Key Characteristics of a Trustworthy Spokesperson
      Effective Crisis Communications Response 

      Effective crisis response is comprised of two simple things: what we do and what we say.  

      Every stakeholder in a crisis expects you to care; a foundational strategy in crisis communications is thus a timely demonstration to the stakeholder that you care and will continue to care as long as that expectation exists. 

      Statements and actions that are stakeholder-centric should be at the core of your communication response strategy. Develop communications strategies and messaging for each stakeholder audience (e.g. students, parents, teachers) to really instill confidence in the university’s ability to manage sensitive and controversial issues. 

      You have three seconds to make your first impression as you get your message across virtually, in-person, or in writing. It is important that in these three seconds you are perceived in a positive manner. 

      Five Components of the Crisis Communication Continuum 

      Furthermore, there are five components of the Crisis Communication Continuum that should be considered as you develop your communication strategy for the higher education community.

      5 Basic Criteria for the Crisis Communication Continuum
      The Golden Hour  

      Incremental delays in showing that we care can have a greater than incremental impact on trust. We can operationalize the Golden Hour – the first hour following a crisis – in ways that are both explanatory of the past and predictive of the future. The cycle of human interaction through digital technology largely dictates the Golden Hour; we therefore must forecast and be proactive in developing messages to successfully establish credibility and build trust.

      The Golden Hour
      The Rule of 45 minutes-6 hours-3 days-2 weeks 

      If you can demonstrate that you care within the first 45 minutes, you can mitigate fear and build trust. If you can consistently show that you care thereafter, you can maintain that trust. 

      If you can’t show that you care within six hours, the narrative will largely be overtaken by other sources, such as influences with louder voices or more clout. 

      If you can’t show that you care within three days, then you will likely face at least two weeks of negative media and a complete loss of trust. 

      The Rule of 45min, 6hr, 3days
      Build a Communications Plan 

      Start from and commit to your institution’s core values and develop all strategies from there. 

      Build your crisis communications team to include leadership, communicators, and other appropriate staff. 

      Develop prescripted messages that are tailored to possible crises. You can adjust those messages later with your communications team if you have a strong core. 

      Don’t be silent. Silence says something, and allows time and space for critics, adversaries, or the media to set another narrative.

      Meet the Experts Featured in This Podcast

      Mark Basnight VP | Strategic Communications

      Mark Basnight

      Former Comms Analyst for DOE/NNSA Enterprise & Public Information Officer (MPIO)

      Holly Hardin Director of Strategic Communications

      Holly Hardin

      Former Comms Analyst for DOE/ NNSA Enterprise & Emergency Management Lead at ORISE

      Ron Edmond, Crisis Communications Subject Matter Expert

      Ron Edmond, Ed.D.

      Former Acting Director of ORISE Emergency Management Lab & Crisis Communication SME

      Adam Montella, Senior Vice President at SummitET

      Adam Montella

      Former GM of Emergency Management for the NY & NJ Port Authority & Disaster Management SME

      Bridging the Gap podcast, episode 5

      Bridging the Gap Episode 5: Crises Create Crises: Applying the IDEA Model to Crisis Communication at Higher Education Institutions

      In this podcast episode, SummitET Strategic Communications experts sit down with the creators of the IDEA Model for Effective Risk and Crisis Communication and discuss how communicators and decision-makers at higher education institutions can apply the the model when addressing sensitive and controversial issues on their campuses.

      Bridging the Gap Episode 4: Crisis Communications for Universities

      Bridging the Gap Episode 4: Strategic Communications for Higher Education: Sensitive and Controversial Issues

      In this podcast episode, SummitET’s team of Strategic Communications experts discuss crisis communications fundamentals that higher education institutions can incorporate when addressing controversial and sensitive issues with their stakeholders.

      SummitET Bridging the Gap Episode 3 Part 1

      Bridging the Gap Episode 3, Part 1: Improving Exercise Design and Evaluation; the XF Score

      In this podcast episode, SummitET preparedness experts and former DHS Acting Secretary and FEMA Administrator discuss the XF Score™️, a rubric for analyzing the effectiveness of tabletop exercises and trainings for crises.

      Active Shooters Over Time

      Active Shooter Incidents Over Time

      “Active shooters” were not always considered cause for alarm in the United States. This post examines the trend of active shooter incidents over time and offers preparedness solutions to mitigate the threat.

      Bridging the Gap Episode 3, Part 1: Improving Exercise Design and Evaluation; the XF Score

      Bridging the Gap Episode 3, Part 1: Improving Exercise Design and Evaluation; the XF Score

      SummitET preparedness experts and guest discuss the XF ScoreTM, a rubric for analyzing the effectiveness of tabletop exercises and trainings for crises.

      Read more about the XF ScoreTM in the following article:

      Creating a New Standard for Evaluating Tabletop Exercises” by John Duda and Scott Glick

      Domestic Preparedness Journal, July 25, 2023 

      Tabletop exercise design checklist

      Is your organization better prepared today after completing a tabletop exercise or training? How did the experience better position you to face a threat or hazard? If it is difficult to answer these questions, how do you know the exercise was an effective use of time and resources?

      In Part 1 of Episode 3 of Bridging the Gap, preparedness experts introduce you to the XF ScoreTM, a rubric for analyzing the effectiveness of tabletop exercises and trainings for crises.

      The creators of the XF ScoreTM speak with Pete Gaynor, former DHS Acting Secretary and former FEMA Administrator, about how this new evaluation tool allows for a better outcome than the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program, or HSEEP. Created by FEMA, HSEEP provides a set of principles for evaluating exercise programs. The XF ScoreTM helps to prove whether your agency is more prepared because of the training and allows you to address weaknesses in a revised training plan.

      Stay tuned for Part 2 of this podcast episode: once you’ve collected data from your training or exercise evaluation, how do you interpret and utilize it to strengthen future plans?

      Contributors:

      Pete Gaynor

      Pete Gaynor

      Former DHS Acting Secretary; Former FEMA Administrator

      John Duda, Chief Executive Officer and founding partner at SummitET

      John Duda

      Co-creator of the XF ScoreTM; Chairman and CEO of SummitET®

      Scott Glick VP and General Counsel

      Scott Glick

      Co-creator of the XF ScoreTM; Former US DOJ Director, Preparedness & Response
      Adam Montella, Senior Vice President at SummitET

      Adam Montella

      Senior Vice President of SummitET®

      Bridging the Gap podcast, episode 5

      Bridging the Gap Episode 5: Crises Create Crises: Applying the IDEA Model to Crisis Communication at Higher Education Institutions

      In this podcast episode, SummitET Strategic Communications experts sit down with the creators of the IDEA Model for Effective Risk and Crisis Communication and discuss how communicators and decision-makers at higher education institutions can apply the the model when addressing sensitive and controversial issues on their campuses.

      Bridging the Gap Episode 4: Crisis Communications for Universities

      Bridging the Gap Episode 4: Strategic Communications for Higher Education: Sensitive and Controversial Issues

      In this podcast episode, SummitET’s team of Strategic Communications experts discuss crisis communications fundamentals that higher education institutions can incorporate when addressing controversial and sensitive issues with their stakeholders.

      SummitET Bridging the Gap Episode 3 Part 1

      Bridging the Gap Episode 3, Part 1: Improving Exercise Design and Evaluation; the XF Score

      In this podcast episode, SummitET preparedness experts and former DHS Acting Secretary and FEMA Administrator discuss the XF Score™️, a rubric for analyzing the effectiveness of tabletop exercises and trainings for crises.

      Active Shooters Over Time

      Active Shooter Incidents Over Time

      “Active shooters” were not always considered cause for alarm in the United States. This post examines the trend of active shooter incidents over time and offers preparedness solutions to mitigate the threat.

      Active Shooter Incidents Over Time

      Active Shooter Incidents Over Time

      With students back in school, concerns about physical safety, including active shooter threats, return for parents and students. According to an August 2022 Gallup poll, 44% of K-12 parents fear for their children’s physical safety at school. That is the highest parental fear has been since 2001, following a shooting at Santana High School in Santee, California. The record high was 55% in April 1999, when parents were polled shortly after the Columbine High School shooting in Littleton, Colorado.

      Active shooter incidents are certainly not limited to K-12 schools. They can occur at institutes of higher education, bars and nightclubs, places of worship, private businesses, government facilities, hospitals and medical clinics, and sports stadiums or arenas. The FBI designated 50 shootings as active shooter incidents in 2022, with the highest number of incidents, 23, taking place in open spaces, followed by the next highest number, 14, occurring in places of commerce.

      Active Shooter Incidents in the United States in 2022, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Page 12

      Active Shooter Incidents in the United States in 2022, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Page 12

      Active Shooter Definition

      Prior to Columbine, the term “active shooter” was not commonly part of the public vernacular and “active shooters” were not considered cause for alarm in the United States. Now the term regularly appears in the news, on social media, and in public settings as school officials, government offices, and private businesses weigh their options for active shooter training and drills.

      The FBI defines an active shooter as “an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a populated area.” Not all active shooter incidents result in fatalities, and most do not turn into mass killings, which is defined by the FBI as three or more people killed at one time in a single location.

      More recently, the term “active threat” has emerged as a broader way to categorize a dynamic situation involving an individual (or individuals) using deadly physical force, to include firearms, bladed weapons, explosives, and vehicles.

      Incidence Trends

      The enactment of the Investigative Assistance for Violent Crimes Act of 2012 strengthened the ability of many federal law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, to dedicate greater resources to help address the active shooter threat, including investigation, research, and law enforcement training.

      The FBI releases reports intended to “provide an overview of active shooter incidents to help law enforcement, other first responders, and the public better understand the levels of threat associated with active shooter incidents.”

      According to the FBI’s report Active Shooter Incidents 20-Year Review, 2000-2019, the number of active shooter incidents between 2000 and 2019 shows an overall upward trend.

      Active Shooter Incidents 20-Year Review 2000-2019, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Page 4

      Active Shooter Incidents 20-Year Review 2000-2019, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Page 4

      Jumping to their most recent report from 2022, it notes that while total active shooter incidents decreased by 18% from 2021, the number increased by 66.7% compared to 2018, and thus for the period 2018-2022 “data shows an upward trend.”

      There are many different databases that track incidences of school shootings, mass shootings, mass killings, and active shooter. The criteria and definitions used in these databases vary widely, resulting in vastly different stories being painted about incidence and trend. Regardless of these differences, what remains is public perception of safety and anxiety over the threat of active shooters.

      Active Shooter Incidents 20-Year Review 2000-2019, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Page 5

      Active Shooter Incidents 20-Year Review 2000-2019, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Page 5

      Exercises and Training to Save Lives

      According to the Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training Center at Texas State University (ALERRT), whose researchers work with the FBI to catalog and examine active shooter attacks, slightly more than half of incidents from 2000 to 2022 ended before law enforcement arrived. To help prevent loss of life, it’s important for individuals and organizations to take additional steps to plan and prepare for active shooter events.

      “Mass shootings: What are the warning signs and could they help prevent another Parkland?” BBC.com

      The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has developed a series of materials to help schools, businesses, and communities prepare for and respond to an active shooter incident. Active shooter situations are often sudden and unpredictable, as the shooter may not have method to their selection of victims. Paying attention to warning signs in the behavior and habits of a potential shooter can help prevent an incident before it happens.

      CISA’s Active Shooter Attacks Action Guide notes that “some shooters demonstrate progressively escalating risk factors in their mindsets and behaviors that characterize them as violent prior to an attack.” Potential warning signs include increasingly erratic, unsafe, or aggressive behaviors, claims of marginalization from friends or colleagues, sudden and dramatic changes in home life or personality, drug and alcohol abuse, financial difficulties, and more. Taking note of these types of drastic changes and reporting behavior or concerns to a supervisor if at work, or a school official in education settings, may facilitate intervention and mitigate potential risks.

      SummitET® provides customized preparedness solutions to reduce the risk posed by active shooter incidents. Much of this risk can be mitigated through the development of an effective preparedness system that includes internal policies and compliance, intelligence and information sharing, physical security protections systems, training, planning, and exercising.

      We offer a suite of tailored preparedness solutions for many public and private sectors and organizations including hospitals, private industry, government facilities, public facilities, schools, and more.

      Our industry experts with extensive backgrounds in law enforcement, infrastructure protection, counterterrorism, counter-WMD, emergency medical/fire rescue, and more can help your organization prepare for the threat of active shooters. Contact us today.

      Contact our experts

      to discuss your training and exercise options.

      Bridging the Gap podcast, episode 5

      Bridging the Gap Episode 5: Crises Create Crises: Applying the IDEA Model to Crisis Communication at Higher Education Institutions

      In this podcast episode, SummitET Strategic Communications experts sit down with the creators of the IDEA Model for Effective Risk and Crisis Communication and discuss how communicators and decision-makers at higher education institutions can apply the the model when addressing sensitive and controversial issues on their campuses.

      Bridging the Gap Episode 4: Crisis Communications for Universities

      Bridging the Gap Episode 4: Strategic Communications for Higher Education: Sensitive and Controversial Issues

      In this podcast episode, SummitET’s team of Strategic Communications experts discuss crisis communications fundamentals that higher education institutions can incorporate when addressing controversial and sensitive issues with their stakeholders.

      SummitET Bridging the Gap Episode 3 Part 1

      Bridging the Gap Episode 3, Part 1: Improving Exercise Design and Evaluation; the XF Score

      In this podcast episode, SummitET preparedness experts and former DHS Acting Secretary and FEMA Administrator discuss the XF Score™️, a rubric for analyzing the effectiveness of tabletop exercises and trainings for crises.

      Active Shooters Over Time

      Active Shooter Incidents Over Time

      “Active shooters” were not always considered cause for alarm in the United States. This post examines the trend of active shooter incidents over time and offers preparedness solutions to mitigate the threat.

      Bridging the Gap Episode 2: Stolen Radiation Sources

      Bridging the Gap Episode 2: Stolen Radiation Sources

      SummitET Subject Matter Experts interpret the emerging threat discussed in the following article. 

      Three months, three missing radioactive items. Here’s what you need to know” by Tara Subramaniam

      CNN.com, March 31, 2023 

      non destructive testing

      The recent articleThree months, three missing radioactive items. Here’s what you need to know provides an overview of the recent loss of regulatory control of three items containing radioisotopes in Thailand, Australia, and the United States. The article offers examples of how radioisotopes are used in commercial applications, discusses their associated hazards, and addresses the frequency of loss of regulatory control as seen in these three cases.

      Radioactive Isotopes Uses

      Radiological materials are used for beneficial purposes across the nation and the world daily – in medicine, research, and industrial applications. These materials are important for diagnosing and treating medical conditions like cancer or to ensure that the integrity of infrastructure like roads or pipelines are verified before beginning construction or use.  

      The nature and use of radioactive materials in devices vary. In the U.S., radioactive materials are highly regulated, and the level of regulation, security, and oversight is based on the potential risk posed from the sources within the device. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and 39 Agreement States work together to ensure that all radioactive materials are properly licensed and used across all industries.

      Industrial Radiography Camera

      The industrial radiography camera, like the one that went missing recently in the U.S., is one common device that has greater regulatory oversight due its use as a high activity source. It is used in industrial settings for various types of non-destructive testing, but most commonly it is used to image welds or other structural integrity of pipes or metal structures. Most of these devices use an Iridium-192 (Ir-192) source which emits strong gamma photons that are needed to penetrate through the metal to create the images used to look for cracks or defects in the welds, among other purposes. Thousands of industrial radiography jobs are safely conducted across the nation every year.

      The Ir-192 source is kept inside a very robust, shielded container, about the size of a shoebox, except when the imaging is occurring – then it is cranked out of the shield through a long tube to expose the film around the pipe or weld of interest. The source is only outside of the shielded housing for 30 seconds to a minute at a time and under very controlled settings carefully managed by the trained operators. This operator training, as well as the requirements for storage, security, transportation, and general use of the device, is outlined in regulations, and the NRC and Agreement States work closely with the licensees who are using these devices.

      Theft or Loss of Radioactive Materials   

      Bottom-line, individuals can’t just go and purchase or use an industrial radiography camera or other higher activity source without meeting stringent regulations that include significant site security and background checks on those employees with access to the materials.  

      However, as indicated in the article, accidents sometimes happen. When they do occur, immediate notification is required, the regulatory agencies actively coordinate with the licensee and any other appropriate agencies to locate the source and oversee any regulatory enforcement actions necessary to prevent other issues from occurring.

      Prevention 

      Sources can go missing by accident or by act of terrorism but in either scenario it is important that agencies are prepared to prevent and mitigate this risk. Preparing via the development of intelligence information sharing pathways, by creating specialized plans for communications, and other lifesaving tactics are what SummitET’s experts focus on when creating tailored solutions including exercises and training. Learn more how experts can help your agency be at its most prepared.

      Contributors:

      Angela Leek, Director of Radiological Solutions and Regulatory Affairs

      Angela Leek, CHP

      Director of Radiological Solutions and Regulatory Affairs

      Andrew Manson Law Enforcement and CBRNE Subject matter expert

      Andrew Manson

      Law Enforcement/CBRNE SME

      Justin walker law enforcement and SWAT Subject matter expert

      Justin Walker

      Law Enforcement SME/Retired Phoenix Police Officer/SWAT Operator; Lead RSARex SME

      Kevin Quigley, CBRN and WMD Subject Matter Expert at SummitET

      Kevin Quigley

      All Hazards SME

      Bridging the Gap podcast, episode 5

      Bridging the Gap Episode 5: Crises Create Crises: Applying the IDEA Model to Crisis Communication at Higher Education Institutions

      In this podcast episode, SummitET Strategic Communications experts sit down with the creators of the IDEA Model for Effective Risk and Crisis Communication and discuss how communicators and decision-makers at higher education institutions can apply the the model when addressing sensitive and controversial issues on their campuses.

      Bridging the Gap Episode 4: Crisis Communications for Universities

      Bridging the Gap Episode 4: Strategic Communications for Higher Education: Sensitive and Controversial Issues

      In this podcast episode, SummitET’s team of Strategic Communications experts discuss crisis communications fundamentals that higher education institutions can incorporate when addressing controversial and sensitive issues with their stakeholders.

      SummitET Bridging the Gap Episode 3 Part 1

      Bridging the Gap Episode 3, Part 1: Improving Exercise Design and Evaluation; the XF Score

      In this podcast episode, SummitET preparedness experts and former DHS Acting Secretary and FEMA Administrator discuss the XF Score™️, a rubric for analyzing the effectiveness of tabletop exercises and trainings for crises.

      Active Shooters Over Time

      Active Shooter Incidents Over Time

      “Active shooters” were not always considered cause for alarm in the United States. This post examines the trend of active shooter incidents over time and offers preparedness solutions to mitigate the threat.